Flow for LD
Set your paper lengthwise and
draw 7 dividers in the following pattern
|
AFF |
CX |
NEG |
CX |
1AR |
NR |
2AR |
|
intro Value: Criteria:
DOT Cont1 Sub a Sub b Cont2 ... Cont3 ... |
List q’s
as needed draw links to other args attacks |
intro Value: Criteria:
challenge DOT if needed Attack on Cont1 Attack on Cont2 Attack on Cont3
Neg Case Cont1 Cont2 |
List q’s
as needed draw links to other args/attacks |
|
|
|
Draw links between arguments as
they are made by the opposing debater.
Flow your args while prepping or after your
speech. Make sure you flow through all
the speeches. It may help to use a
different color pen when flowing the AFF/NEG
arguments.
Introduction
This should be a story,
quote, lyric or some other AGD (Attention Getting Device)
Value: This is the broad
overarching goal that is either achieved by affirming or negating the
resolution. This tends to be a vague or
broad idea. This is about the same as
the thesis as the point of the essay is the same as the value in a case.
Criteria/Criterion: This is
how the value is measured/achieved. This is a more
detailed approach. The information in
this is stored throughout the entire case.
All points in the case should lead to or support this idea.
Sample:
Value: Childhood Innocence
Criteria: Ignorance of the
real world
The affirmative case is
almost the same as a standard five paragraph essay. An introduction is necessary for a successful
case. The case should be almost exactly
6 minutes long. The thesis of the essay
is almost the same as the value of the case as it is the main point that the
essay should support. An affirmative
case should have 3-4 contentions or main arguments to support the criteria. In LD the contentions or arguments should be
a mixture of evidence and opinion. This
should be a convincing argument so use your literary skills. The contentions are the WHY of the case. They are when you explain the
value/criteria. You need to tie back
into your introduction when you conclude.
It should echo the idea of your value and criteria.
The negative case is much
shorter you should only spend 3-4 minutes of the negative constructive speech
in the Neg case.
The remainder of the time needs to be spent attacking the affirmative
case. Again a value and a criteria are necessary for the negative side. As the neg your
burden is to clash with the affirmative and true clash cannot be achieved if
you do not present an opposing value/criteria pair. You should have one or two contentions on the
negative side. Make sure that the
taglines for the negative are clear and easy to understand for the judge and
the aff.
CX
One of the most important
parts of the debate is the cross examination period. Both the affirmative and the negative have
the opportunity to ask the other questions to increase the clarification of
their opponents case or to lead the way to a better
attack on the opponents case. To do the
best possible job in CX you should have 6-10 questions automatically ready for
the opponent. Specific clarifications on
their value, criteria, or case are good.
Also to have explanations in their own words of their
arguments. To
get further analysis of their case.
Also how their approach clashes with your own. This should be done facing the judge. Make sure you are asking questions and not
making statements.
Speech Order
The speech order is as
follows:
Affirmative Constructive 6
minutes (AC)
Cross-Examination 3 minutes
Negative Constructive 7
minutes (NC)
Cross-Examination 3 minutes
First Affirmative Rebuttal 4
minutes (1AR)
Negative Rebuttal 6 minutes
(NR)
Second Affirmative Rebuttal 3
minutes (2AR)
Speech Breakdown
One of the key things to
achieve success or increase your standings is to always use the full amount of
time. When you do not complete the time
for a speech it is like you are granting extra time to your opponent to attack
you since there will be less for them to cover in their speech. This is especially true of the affirmative
speeches.
AC
Totally
prepared speech. This will become memorized the more it is
done. You should never have extra time
on this speech. ALWAYS use the full time
on this speech.
CX
This is a period for
clarification and preparation. New
arguments can be created via well directed questions in the CX slot.
NC
Half prepared speech. This speech is half case and half
attack. The case arguments must directly
clash with the affirmative case. The neg must also attack the V,C, and
contentions of the AFF side.
CX
This is a period for
clarification and preparation. New
arguments can be created via well directed questions in the CX slot.
1AR
This four minute speech is
the AFF’s chance to rebuild its case after the
attacks of the NEG. The best time to use
the prep time on the AFF side is now.
The Criteria and Value are the main things that must be rebuilt. Then support the contentions. Then attack the
negative.
NR
The negative has only one
rebuttal and should be spent rebuilding negative position. Then attacking the
affirmatives case. Finally the
negative should present the voting issues(Voters) for
the round. These are the key arguments
the neg feels are necessary to decide the outcome of
the debate.
2AR
Most of this speech will be
prepared before the round. There should
be a few continuations of the arguments from the round. The remainder of the speech is a defense of
the affirmative position and the presentation of the AFF voters.
Shake hands and thank the
judge and you are ready to go to the next round!